|
Canada Gets Serious about Radon
Health Canada is poised to tighten up guidelines for radon gas levels
in indoor air, to a level four times more stringent than current
guidelines. It could mean that radon testing will become mandatory in
future real estate transactions, and that building codes for new homes
will be upgraded.
Critics say that
Canada should have adopted the stricter guidelines in the 1980s, when
the United States and other countries around the world set their radon
guidelines. But Health Canada says that "until recently, there was no
evidence providing a direct link between radon levels in the home and
lung cancer." The ministry says that, "However, in 2005, two
independent scientific studies performed in Europe and North America
showed that lung cancer risks extend to levels of radon found in some
homes depending on the length of time an individual is exposed to it."
Canada's current
guideline of 800 becquerels per cubic metre is the second highest
allowed in the world. The new proposal would set the level at 200
becquerels, which is the same as the United Kingdom, Australia, Norway,
Spain and several other companies. The toughest guideline is in the
United States, at 150 becquerels.
Fergal Nolan,
president of the Radiation Safety Institute of Canada, told media
outlets that he asked Health Canada to match the U.S. guidelines back
in 1988, but that the ministry didn't take the threat seriously.
However, Health
Canada says there was no conclusive evidence before 2004 that radon
levels in buildings were directly linked to lung cancer. Now, it
acknowledges that radon can pose a serious health risk.
Radon is an
odourless radioactive gas that occurs naturally in the environment. It
is caused by the natural breakdown of uranium in soils and rocks. In
the open air it does not pose a health risk, but in an enclosed space
such as a mine or a basement, breathing in radon decay products can
lead to lung cancer.
The Health Canada
report estimates that lung cancers from radon exposure account for
about 10 per cent of all lung cancers, second only behind smoking. It
says an estimated 1,600 lung cancer deaths in 2000 can be attributed to
radon. "The number of radon-induced lung cancers is about one-half of
the deaths due to automobile accidents, and is equal to the combined
total of deaths due to accidental poisonings, homicides, drownings and
fires," says the Health Canada report. "In any other situation, this
number of deaths would certainly justify a major public health
initiative."
Radon can seep
into a house through dirt floors, cracks in concrete walls and floors,
sumps, basement drains, and through concrete block walls. Radon levels
are higher in some geographic areas than others, and Health Canada is
current working on a mapping system to identify the hottest radon
zones.
However,
predicting which houses have radon and which ones don't is difficult.
"Factors such as the location of the house and its relation to the
prevailing wind may be just an important as the source of the radon,"
says the Health Canada report. Radon levels can vary from season to
season, with the highest levels usually recorded during winter.
One estimate
says that about 175,000 Canadian homes, or almost three per cent of
single-family homes, have radon levels above the proposed new guideline
of 200 becquerels, and will need to be repaired to ensure the safety of
its occupants.
In discussing the
implementation of the proposed guidelines, the Health Canada report
says several Canadian companies currently offer radon testing services,
and the average cost is about $50 per test. It says that a national
certification program should be considered to ensure that testing
standards are determined and enforced.
For houses that require work, the average "mitigation" cost would be about $1,200 per house, says the report.
"Active soil
depressurization has been found to be the most effective and reliable
radon reduction technique in existing homes," says the report. "This
method involves installing a vent pipe through the basement floor slab
or connecting it to the foundation drain tiles through the sump. A fan
which runs continuously is connected to the vent pipe. This reverses
the air pressure difference between the house and the soil, so that air
flows from the house into the soil, preventing soil gas entry, and
reducing concentrations of soil gas, including radon, next to the
foundation."
The report says
open sumps should be fitted with airtight covers with special traps
that allow water to drain, but prevent radon from entering the
basement. Major gaps in the basement floor or in the top of foundation
and interior load-bearing walls should be sealed, as should minor
cracks in foundation walls and floors. Other gaps around utility
penetrations should be sealed. Exposed soil in a crawlspace should be
covered by a barrier with sealed edges and joints, says the report.
"What is required
for testing services also applies in large measure to builders and
contractors providing radon mitigation services. Standards and
guidelines need to be developed and this includes revisions to
national, provincial, and local building codes. These guidelines could
be more rigorously enforced in radon-prone areas," says the report.
"The approach here is not to over-regulate the building industry, but
to provide it with the knowledge and tools needed to play an effective
role in radon mitigation."
The report says
that "a combination of radon-resistant requirements in new homes and
mandatory testing of existing homes could lead to virtually complete
compliance with the new Canadian radon guidelines within a decade."
Written by Jim Adair
Wondering What Your Home Is Worth? -- Let me show you.
|